|
Dr. S. Evans’ Standard Grading Rubric
Grade Scale:
See syllabus.
*Plus and minus grades reflect nuances (ex: how students use required sources; barely meeting source requirements or including many sources but not analyzing them; structural cohesion, strength and validity of argument).
Writing Process Checklist
- Brainstorm/ free-write
- Outline/ grouping ideas
- Research (if applicable)
- Draft 1/ “rough draft”
- Self-edit
- Peer-conference (if applicable)
- Draft 2/ revise
- Teacher/student conference (if applicable)
- Final draft/ review, revise, and final edit
- Resource documentation (if applicable)
Language: Word choice and appropriate tone/language (no slang, jargon,
generalities or cliches; “standard” English; vivid and
specific nouns, verbs, and adjectives) Verb voice (active = subject acting, passive = subject acted
upon) Advanced vocabulary, sentence variety, writing not trite or
contrived
Mechanics:
Subject/verb agreement in verb person, number, and tense (we
are, I am)
Complete sentences and correct structure
No comma splices (two sentences joined only by a comma)
No fused (run-on) sentences (two sentences with no punctuation)
No sentence fragments (not a complete thought - ex: When I went to the
mall. Or sentences beginning with “and” or
“but”) Punctuation (correct use of commas, semicolons, colons, end
punctuation, apostrophes, quotation marks, parentheses, dashes,
etc.)
Correct spelling and capitalization
Correct use of pronouns (ex: who as subject, whom as object; each
pronoun refers to something specific), adjectives, and adverbs (adverb
after verb; before adjectives and other adverbs) ("ran
quickly", not "quickly ran")
Does the work answer the question or achieve its purpose?
Is the thesis clearly stated and developed throughout the work?
Is there a clearly organized introduction, body, and conclusion?
Are the paragraphs written clearly and presented in a logical order
that focuses only on main topic?
Are there enough supporting details in each paragraph to describe
and/or explain the topic?
Does the writing guide the reader? Is it clear that the author knows
where she/he is going?
Is the writing genuine, original, and interesting? Does the author
offer analysis and original perspectives rather than a simple book
report?
Is the writing brief and concise?
Are critical insights and critical thinking (i.e. analyzing,
compare/contrasting, stating convictions with supporting evidence,
evaluating, and/or proposing a solution) apparent?
Does the writing give an overall impression of academic confidence,
integrity, and discipline?
Sources: Peterson’s AP English/Literature Composition,
Prentice Hall American Literature, The College
Writer’s Reference, The Bedford Guide for College
Writers, The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Writing,
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (English Language
Arts), Mt. Holyoke CC Upward Bound English Syllabus (1999),
Think About Editing (A. Ascher)
|